Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; August 2007; v. 13; no. 3; p. 197-203; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.13.3.197
© 2007 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN BAARS, Stefan.
Right arrow Articles by VAN DE GRAAF, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Determination of Organic Soil Permeability Using The Piezocone Dissipation Test

Stefan. VAN BAARS1 and Henke C. VAN DE GRAAF2

1 Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
2 Lankelma Geotechniek-Zuid, P.O. Box 38, 5688 ZG Oirschot, The Netherlands


Figure 01
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Piezocone with mid-face and shoulder pore-pressure sensors

 

Figure 02
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Different types of pore water pressure dissipation curves

 

Figure 03
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. Difference between the measured pressure of the mid-face and shoulder elements (after Shiyo Chen and Mayne, 1994)

 

Figure 04
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 4. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional groundwater flow

 

Figure 05
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 5. Relative pore pressure as a function of the dissipation constant (r = 2.5 cm)

 

Figure 06
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 6. Relative pore pressure as a function of the distance from the origin

 

Figure 07
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 7. Determination of the dissipation constant

 

Figure 08
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 8. Dissipation test in organic silty clay near Pannerden

 

Figure 09
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 9. Dissipation test in organic silty clay near Rijswijk

 

Figure 10
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 10. Dissipation test in organic silty clay in Rotterdam

 




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Association of Engineering Geologists