Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 2003; v. 9; no. 4; p. 363-376; DOI: 10.2113/9.4.363
© 2003 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DUZGOREN-AYDIN, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by AYDIN, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Chemical Heterogeneities of Weathered IgneousProfiles: Implications for Chemical Indices

NURDAN S. DUZGOREN-AYDIN1 and ADNAN AYDIN1

1 Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR CHINA

This study investigates the behavior of chemical elements and the performance of chemical indices within and between weathered pyroclastic and granitic profiles. The profiles were developed under humid, relatively well-drained conditions in Hong Kong. Levels of chemical heterogeneity of the profiles are assessed, and their adverse effects on the selection and use of chemical indices are discussed. Distribution of the chemical elements varies significantly within and between the profiles. At the early stages of weathering, behavior of the elements is fairly predictable and largely controlled by the degree of weathering. At the advanced stages, however, behavior of the elements can be erratic and appears to be governed by micro-environmental conditions and the degree of weathering. Based on the nature of the chemical elements displaying unpredictable distribution along the weathered profiles, two groups of elements are identified. The first group includes K and Al together with loss-on-ignition content. Their variation can be explained in terms of the type and abundance of clay minerals. The second group comprises Fe and Mn, and their unexpected behavior can be correlated with the irregular distribution of sesquioxide-rich zones. Micro-environmental conditions, which govern the type and abundance of clay minerals and sesquioxides, ultimately determine the level of chemical heterogeneity of the profiles. Parent-normalized major element variation diagrams are useful tools for assessing the level of chemical heterogeneity of the profiles. Overall, the pyroclastic profile displays a higher level of heterogeneity than the granitic profile. Performances of chemical indices are particularly poor where a high level of chemical heterogeneity exists. Similarly, chemical indices based on the elements displaying similar geochemical behavior or the degree of decomposition of a single mineral (e.g., plagioclase) will not remain valid over the entire course of weathering. Given that each profile has its own way of responding to weathering processes, the search for a universally accepted ‘best chemical index’ is likely to disappoint. Recognizing the significance of the processes and products of weathering in controlling behavior of the chemical elements, however, and thus in generating chemical heterogeneities helps to avoid random or subjective selection of chemical indices and to interpret unforeseen deviations.

Key Words: Geochemistry • Chemical Indices • Clay Minerals • Hong Kong • Weathering • Sesquioxide







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists