Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 2003; v. 9; no. 4; p. 327-338; DOI: 10.2113/9.4.327
© 2003 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Hydrogeology and Water Resource Potential of Neogene Sediments in the Tualatin Basin and Comparison with the Neighboring Portland Basin, Northwest Oregon

DOYLE C. WILSON1,1

1 Geology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207-0751

Hydrogeologic properties of the Neogene Hillsboro Formation and Willamette Silt in the Tualatin basin are evaluated to provide a foundation for future groundwater use in the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area, and are then compared to hydrogeological conditions in the neighboring Portland basin. Catastrophic flood deposits of the Willamette Silt in the Tualatin Valley have low hydraulic conductivities and well yields below 7 gpm (26.5 lpm). Fluvial sand aquifers within the Hillsboro Formation compose only 20 percent of the 1,400-ft (450-m) thick unit and most contain a significant quantity of silt and clay, with hydraulic conductivities on the order of 2–30 ft/day (0.6–6 m/day). Water quality is good, yet low well yields (6–100 gpm; 23–380 lpm), a low hydraulic gradient within the basin, and geochemical data point to residence times of tens to hundreds of years and slow recharge to the system. A numerical simulation verifies slow groundwater velocities and the presence of local and regional flow regimes. Aquifers of the Hillsboro Formation are limited to domestic use, and model simulations of hypothetical well fields show that these aquifers would not support large-scale withdrawals. High-yield aquifers of the coarse-grained Troutdale Formation in the Portland basin contrast sharply with those of the Hillsboro Formation and Willamette Silt in that they can be separated into multiple hydrogeologic units, have high hydraulic conductivities, and can be used for municipal purposes. Such drastic differences in hydrogeologic characteristics within a metropolitan area require different strategies involving groundwater use or remediation.

Key Words: Hillsboro Formation • Willamette Silt • Hydrogeologic Unit • Residence Time • Numerical Simulation







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists