Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 2003; v. 9; no. 4; p. 313-326; DOI: 10.2113/9.4.313
© 2003 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEE, H.
Right arrow Articles by SPRY, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Reduction of Concrete Expansion by Ettringite Using Crystallization Inhibition Techniques

HYOMIN LEE1, ROBERT D. CODY1, ANITA M. CODY1 and PAUL G. SPRY1

1 Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, 253 Science I, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3212

Many researchers have proposed that secondary or delayed ettringite is responsible for serious, premature deterioration of concrete highways. The current research project was designed to determine experimentally if secondary ettringite formation in concrete can be reduced by treating the concrete with commercial crystallization-inhibitor chemicals. The hypothesis is that if ettringite is reduced, a concomitant reduction of concrete expansion and cracking will occur. If ettringite formation and concrete deterioration are simultaneously reduced, then the case for ettringite-induced expansion/cracking is strengthened. Our experiments used four commercial inhibitors—two phosphonates, a polyacrylic acid, and a phosphate ester. Concrete blocks were subjected to continuous-immersion, wet/dry cycling, and freeze/thaw cycling in sodium sulfate solutions and in sulfate solutions containing an inhibitor. The two phosphonate inhibitors were effective in reducing ettringite nucleation and growth in the concrete. Two other non-phosphonate inhibitors were somewhat effective, although less so than the two phosphonates. Reduction of new ettringite formation in concrete blocks also reduced expansion and cracking of the blocks. This relationship clearly links concrete expansion with ettringite formation. Secondary ettringite nucleation and growth must cause concrete expansion, because the only effect of these inhibitor chemicals is to reduce crystal nucleation and growth. These inhibitors cannot be responsible in any other way for reduction in expansion.

Key Words: Ettringite, Highway Deterioration, Concrete, Inhibitor







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists