Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; February 2003; v. 9; no. 1; p. 37-49; DOI: 10.2113/9.1.37
© 2003 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SEOL, Y.
Right arrow Articles by SCHWARTZ, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A Review of In Situ Chemical Oxidation and Heterogeneity

Y. SEOL1, H. ZHANG1 and F. W. SCHWARTZ1

1 Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210

Chemical oxidants are increasingly being used for the in situ destruction of organic contaminants in groundwater. The most common implementation involves using an injection/withdrawal system to circulate oxidants (e.g., potassium permanganate, hydrogen peroxide, and Fenton's reagent) through a source zone containing a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL). Because the efficiency of chemical oxidation is highly dependent on geological heterogeneities, effective delivery schemes are essential for successful remediation. This article reviews the impact of heterogeneities on the success of in situ chemical oxidation. Physical heterogeneities are primarily concerned with the permeable pathways along which oxidants are transported to the zone of contamination. Chemical heterogeneities refer generally to variability in geochemical properties that also bear on the efficiency of oxidant flooding. Both types of heterogeneities work against bringing the oxidant to zones of high contaminant saturations. The highly heterogeneous distribution of contaminants and difficulties in characterization make it difficult to target specific zones for treatment. As a result, large volumes of sediments could be treated whether they are contaminated or not. Heterogeneities in hydraulic conductivity at most sites provide an intensive dose of chemical reagents along permeable pathways and little treatment of low-conductivity zones. Large quantities of oxidizable materials in geologic units are capable of consuming the oxidant during delivery. Reaction products [e.g., CO2, MnO2, and Fe(OH)3] tend to plug the porous medium, especially in zones with large contaminant saturations. The oxidant flood is diverted away from these zones, making the flooding inefficient.

Key Words: Heterogeneities • Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) • Permanganate • Oxidant • Remediation






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists