Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 2001; v. 7; no. 4; p. 343-355; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.7.4.343
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coonrod, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vantassell, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evaluation of alternative cover systems using GIS

Julie Coonrod, John Stormont, and Lisa Vantassell

University of New Mexico, Department of Civil Engineering, Albuquerque, NM, United States

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be used to determine and display the depths of native soil covers required for waste containment sites. Readily available data for the State of New Mexico are used in a GIS environment to determine the required depth of two separate cover systems. The depth of an evapotranspirative (ET) soil cover is determined using the available water capacity of the soil and the amount of dormant precipitation. The thickness of a capillary barrier cover system is determined using unsaturated hydraulic parameters, the amount of dormant precipitation, and an iterative numerical model. A difference map showing the savings using a capillary barrier instead of an ET cover is then created. The use of a capillary barrier in areas with fine-grained soils can decrease the necessary soil cover thickness by 90 cm of soil. The computed cover thickness compare well with those determined using Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) (Schroeder et al., 1994), a model commonly used in New Mexico to determine if alternative cover systems can meet the required performance criteria.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists