Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 2001; v. 7; no. 4; p. 321-341; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.7.4.321
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Debris-flow generation from recently burned watersheds

Susan H. Cannon

U. S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States

Evaluation of the erosional response of 95 recently burned drainage basins in Colorado, New Mexico and southern California to storm rainfall provides information on the conditions that result in fire-related debris flows. Debris flows were produced from only 37 of 95 ( approximately 40 percent) basins examined; the remaining basins produced either sediment-laden streamflow or no discernable response. Debris flows were thus not the prevalent response of the burned basins. The debris flows that did occur were most frequently the initial response to significant rainfall events. Although some hillslopes continued to erode and supply material to channels in response to subsequent rainfall events, debris flows were produced from only one burned basin following the initial erosive event. Within individual basin, debris flows initiated through both runoff and infiltration-triggered processes. The fact that not all burned basins produced debris flows suggests that specific geologic and geomorphic conditions may control the generation of fire-related debris flows. The factors that best distinguish between debris-flow producing drainages and those that produced sediment-laden streamflow are drainage-basin morphology and lithology, and the presence or absence of water-repellent soils. Basins underlain by sedimentary rocks were most likely to produce debris flows that contain large material, and sand- and gravel-dominated flows were generated primarily from terrain underlain by decomposed granite. Basin-area and relief thresholds define the morphologic conditions under which both types of debris flows occur. Debris flows containing large material are more likely to be produced from basins without water-repellent soils than from basins with water repellency. The occurrence of sand-and gravel-dominated debris flows depends on the presence of water-repellent soils.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. L. Reneau, D. Katzman, G. A. Kuyumjian, A. Lavine, and D. V. Malmon
Sediment delivery after a wildfire
Geology, February 1, 2007; 35(2): 151 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
J. D. Stock and W. E. Dietrich
Erosion of steepland valleys by debris flows
GSA Bulletin, September 1, 2006; 118(9-10): 1125 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
D. M.J.S. Bowman and G. S Boggs
Fire ecology
Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2006; 30(2): 245 - 257.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists