Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; August 1999; v. 5; no. 3; p. 339-351
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jakubowski, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Prediction of stream channel erosion potential

Peter M. Allen, Jeff Arnold, and Ed Jakubowski

Baylor University, Department of Geology, Waco, TX, United States

Field tests using a submerged jet apparatus were conducted to determine the erodibility coefficients in alluvial soils along stream channels. The soils tested ranged from cohesive clay soils to non-cohesive sandy soils. In addition to performing the jet test at thirty sample sites, laboratory tests on soil samples taken from each site were done to determine soil bulk density, antecedent soil moisture, Atterburg limits, and grain size distribution. Regression analysis was performed on these parameters against the erodibility coefficient to assess whether laboratory testing could be used to extend the submerged jet test results upstream and downstream. Best results were obtained with equations stratified by percent clay and soil activity with multiple correlation coefficients ranging from 0.78 to 0.96. Preliminary efficiency of the equations was 64 percent (coefficient of determination .71) when compared to an independent data set. Use of the erosion coefficient in a stream channel degradation model is shown.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. M. Wynn, S. Mostaghimi, J. A. Burger, A. A. Harpold, M. B. Henderson, and L.-A. Henry
Variation in Root Density along Stream Banks
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 2030 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists