Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 1998; v. 4; no. 4; p. 491-502
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blount, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Physicochemical and biogeochemical stabilization of uranium in a low level radioactive waste disposal cell

Jonathan G. Blount

Jacobs Engineering, Oak Ridge, TN, United States

An on-site disposal cell is being evaluated for the long-term disposition of materials generated by CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980) remediation activities on the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The leaching characteristics of the expected waste materials indicates that uranium concentrations in the leachate could exceed 30 mg/L. Addition of a geochemical barrier to the disposal cell design, or the application of chemical amendments to the waste materials, have been suggested as methods to reduce uranium levels in leachate leaving the disposal cell. Three promising approaches were identified: a) stabilization of mobile uranium by sulfate-reducing bacteria; b) stabilization of uranium as low solubility oxides by hydrated lime addition; and c) sorption of mobile uranium by a peat moss-based geochemical barrier in the disposal cell. Bench scale tests were conducted to evaluate the relative effectiveness of these three approaches. The results suggest that: a) a peat moss-based barrier would be effective in removing uranium initially, but long-term exposure to an alkaline leachate would result in the resolubilization and transport of uranium previously sorbed onto the peat moss; b) even large applications of hydrated lime to uranium-contaminated soils would not stabilize uranium in a high alkalinity, high pH environment; and c) mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria will greatly attenuate uranium levels (even in alkaline solutions) by precipitating it in the reduced form as UO 2 . Consequently, a geochemical barrier containing sulfate-reducing bacteria should be more effective than one using peat moss or hydrated lime.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists