Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; August 1998; v. 4; no. 3; p. 331-340
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kruse, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Geib, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Use of electrical and electromagnetic techniques to map seawater intrusion near the Cross-Florida Barge Canal

S. E. Kruse, M. R. Brudzinski, and T. L. Geib

University of South Florida, Department of Geology, Tampa, FL, United States
University of Illinois, United States
Purdue University, United States

A sea-level canal, originally dredged to form the westernmost portion of the proposed Cross-Florida Barge Canal, extends approximately 13 km inland from the Gulf coast of Florida. Previous regional geophysical studies and water quality data showed high ground conductivities associated with seawater intrusion (increased chloride concentrations) and other processes near the canal. New electromagnetic and resistivity surveys demonstrate the shallow high-conductivity zone associated with seawater mixing extends 150-200 m perpendicular to the canal along the westernmost 7 km of the canal. Ground conductivities show no significant deviations from background values along the eastern 6 km of the canal. Values measured within 100 m of the canal show a general decrease from >100 mS/m near the Gulf coast to a background value of approximately 10 mS/m 7 km inland. Superimposed on this general trend are considerable local variations which probably reflect spatial variability in the fracturing of carbonate rocks and the impact of gravel mining operations. Comparison of vertical electrical soundings made in 1994 and in 1986 (Hagemeyer and Stewart, 1991) suggests that the saline water zone around the canal was stable during this period. Numerical models simulating resistivity surveys near such a high-conductivity zone indicate that one-dimensional interpretation of resistivity soundings yields only slight overestimates of the width of the high-conductivity zone.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists