Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 1997; v. 3; no. 4; p. 537-548
This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alden, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Munster, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Assessment of river-floodplain aquifer interactions

Andrew S. Alden, and Clyde L. Munster

K.W. Brown Environmental Services, College Station, TX, United States
Texas A&M University, United States

The interaction between the Brazos River and the adjacent floodplain aquifer was studied for 200 days in 1995 at a ground-water research site near College Station, Texas. Two In Situ Permeable Flow Sensors (ISPFS) and a grid of well nests were used to correlate river stage to the magnitude and direction of ground-water flow at depth of 13.7 m and 18.3 m in the unconfined alluvial aquifer. Linear relationships between ground-water flow and river stage were determined at each depth. The floodplain aquifer responded differently to changes in river stage at the 13.7 m and 18.3 m depths. The horizontal velocity, parallel and perpendicular to the river, decreased with increasing river stage and increased with decreasing river stage, at both depths. However, the rates of change varied between the two depths. This caused the magnitude and direction of ground-water flow to be different at the two depths. The upward vertical velocity increased with increasing river stage at the 13.7 m depth and decreased with increasing river stage at the 18.3 m depth. At the 13.7 m depth, vertical ground-water flow gradually changed from upward to downward flow with long term river stage decline. Downward ground-water flow was not observed at the 18.3 m depth. Assessment of river-aquifer interactions indicates that a direct and measurable relationship exists between river stage and ground-water flow components at the site. The magnitude and direction of ground-water flow in the alluvial floodplain aquifer may be predicted if river stage is known.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists