Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; May 2009; v. 15; no. 2; p. 81-89; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.15.2.81
© 2009 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ERGULER, Z. A.
Right arrow Articles by SHAKOOR, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Quantification of Fragment Size Distribution of Clay-Bearing Rocks after Slake Durability Testing

ZEYNAL ABIDDIN ERGULER1 and ABDUL SHAKOOR2

1 Department of Geological Engineering, Dumlupinar University, 43100 Kutahya Turkey
2 Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242

Slaking of clay-bearing rocks (shales, claystones, mudstones, siltstones), upon interaction with water, causes numerous problems in engineering construction. The slaking behavior of clay-bearing rocks is generally evaluated by three tests: the jar slake test, the slake index test, and the slake durability test. Among these, the latter is the most commonly used test. When the slake durability test is performed on a sample of clay-bearing rock, the material retained in the 2-mm mesh drum consists of disintegrated fragments of various sizes. The American Society for Testing and Materials method for the slake durability test requires that the retained fragments be categorized as type I material (primarily large fragments), type II material (mixture of large and small fragments), or type III material (primarily small fragments). This paper presents a new quantitative method of describing the nature of material. The method quantifies the fragment size distribution of the slaked material in terms of "disintegration ratio," defined as the ratio of the area under the fragment size distribution curve to the total area encompassing the curve. A durability classification system based on disintegration ratio is recommended for assessing the durability of clay-bearing rocks.

Key Words: Clay-Bearing Rocks • Disintegration Ratio • Durability • Fragment Size Distribution • Slake Durability Test







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Association of Engineering Geologists