Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; February 2009; v. 15; no. 1; p. 29-40; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.15.1.29
© 2009 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHAKOOR, A.
Right arrow Articles by BAREFIELD, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Relationship between Unconfined Compressive Strength and Degree of Saturation for Selected Sandstones

ABDUL SHAKOOR1 and EDWARD H. BAREFIELD2

1 Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242
2 Michael Baker Jr., Inc., 4301 Dutch Ridge Road, Beaver, PA 15009

Unconfined compressive strength of rocks is known to vary with changes in moisture content. However, previous studies report inconsistent results about this subject. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between unconfined compressive strength and varying degrees of saturation for sandstone rocks and explain it in terms of index engineering properties and petrographic characteristics. Eighteen NX-size (2.125 inches or 5.4 cm in diameter) cores were prepared from each of the nine sandstones sampled from central Ohio through central Pennsylvania. Laboratory tests were conducted to determine absorption, dry density, specific gravity, and porosity values for each core. Cores were then tested for unconfined compressive strength at 0 percent, 20 percent, 40 percent, 60 percent, 80 percent, and 100 percent saturation. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the relationship between unconfined compressive strength and degree of saturation. The results indicate significant trends of unconfined compressive strength reduction with increasing degree of saturation and strength reductions of up to 71.6 percent between dry and saturated states. The trends are more consistent for high-strength sandstones than those for medium- to low-strength sandstones, which display less predictable behavior. Some sandstones show a majority of strength reduction occurring by 20 percent saturation, and minimal to indiscernible strength reductions at higher saturation levels. Based on these results, prediction equations were developed for sandstones, which were grouped into four classes on the basis of their absorption values. The input parameters required for the prediction equations include degree of saturation and one or more of the index engineering properties.

Key Words: Unconfined Compressive Strength • Degree of Saturation • Index Engineering Properties • Petrographic Characteristics • Statistical Analysis







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Association of Engineering Geologists