Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; August 2008; v. 14; no. 3; p. 199-219; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.14.3.199
© 2008 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CRONIN, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by BAYLISS, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Seismo-Lineament Analysis Method (SLAM): A Reconnaissance Tool to Help Find Seismogenic Faults

VINCENT S. CRONIN1, MARK MILLARD1, LAUREN SEIDMAN1 and BRIAN BAYLISS1

1 Department of Geology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97354, Waco, TX 76798-7354

The Seismo-Lineament Analysis Method (SLAM) integrates data from earthquakes, geomorphology, and geological fieldwork to facilitate recognition of seismogenic faults. SLAM is a set of procedures that can spatially correlate a nodal plane from an earthquake focal-mechanism solution with faults observed at the ground surface. The intersection of the ground surface with the uncertainty volume of a given nodal plane defines a seismo-lineament. The surface trace of the fault that produced the earthquake is likely to be located within the seismo-lineament (1) if the nodal plane is coincident with the fault, (2) if the fault is emergent, and (3) if the fault is approximately planar at the scale of the analysis. As an example, SLAM was applied to a M2.9 earthquake with a strike-slip focal-mechanism solution and an epicenter near Point Dume in the Santa Monica Mountains, southern California. Geomorphic lineaments and several faults with low pressure-temperature (PT) gouge zones and sub-horizontal shear striae were observed within and parallel to the seismo-lineament of a nodal plane oriented 095 75SW associated with left-lateral strike slip. This zone of strike-slip faults is not included on published maps and will require additional fieldwork to characterize. Extending >20 km, this may be an important (perhaps newly emergent) structure in the Santa Monica Mountains. Under appropriate circumstances, SLAM can generate spatial hypotheses relating earthquakes to faults observed at the ground surface, even in cases when lack of Holocene cover may constrain trench studies.

Key Words: Paleo-Seismology • Active Tectonics • DEM • Fault • Earthquake • Focal-Mechanism Solution • Santa Monica Mountains • Malibu Coast Fault







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Association of Engineering Geologists