Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; February 2008; v. 14; no. 1; p. 1-16; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.14.1.1
© 2008 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRANKMAN, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by BAISE, L. G.

Liquefaction Susceptibility Mapping in Boston, Massachusetts

CHARLES M. BRANKMAN1,1 and LAURIE G. BAISE2

1 William Lettis & Associates, Inc., 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262, Walnut Creek, CA 94596
2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, 113 Anderson Hall, Medford, MA 02155

The Boston, Massachusetts, metropolitan area has experienced several historic earthquakes of about magnitude 6.0. A compilation of surficial geologic maps of the Boston, Massachusetts, metropolitan area and geotechnical analyses of Quaternary sedimentary deposits using nearly 3,000 geotechnical borehole logs reveal varying levels of susceptibility of these units to earthquake-induced liquefaction, given the generally accepted design earthquake for the region (M6.0 with 0.12g Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA)). The majority of the boreholes are located within the extensive downtown artificial fill units, but they also allow characterization of the natural deposits outside the downtown area. The geotechnical data were complemented with surficial geologic mapping, combining published and unpublished geologic maps, aerial photographic interpretation, and soil stratigraphy data from an additional 12,000 geotechnical boring logs. Susceptibility maps were developed based on liquefaction-triggering threshold ground motions, which were determined using the borehole data. We find that much of the non-engineered artificial fill that underlies the downtown Boston area is, when saturated, highly susceptible to liquefaction during seismic loading. Holocene alluvial and marsh deposits in the region are also moderately to highly susceptible to liquefaction. Much of the outlying area is underlain by Pleistocene and Quaternary glacial and glaciofluvial deposits, which have low to moderate susceptibility to liquefaction. This study provides data needed to effectively manage liquefaction hazards in the Boston area, and it will assist in characterizing seismic hazards, mitigating risks, and providing information for urban planning and emergency response.

Key Words: Liquefaction • Seismic Hazards • Engineering Geology • Geotechnical • Surficial Geology







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists