Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; November 2006; v. 12; no. 4; p. 301-314; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.12.4.301
© 2006 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BISHOP, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by CLEMENTS, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Poverty Hills, Owens Valley, California—Transpressional Uplift or Ancient Landslide Deposit?

KIM M. BISHOP1 and STEVE CLEMENTS2

1 Department of Geology, California State University, Los Angeles, 5151 State University Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90032
2 SCS Engineers, 6601 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 140, Pleasanton, CA 64566

The Poverty Hills are a 5 km2, 300-m-high mass of plutonic and meta-sedimentary rocks exposed along the axis of the alluviated Owens Valley graben in eastern California. Two models have been proposed for the origin of the hills. One model suggests the hills represent a transpressional uplift along a 3-km left-step in the right-lateral Owens Valley fault zone, and the other proposes that the hills are a long-runout rock-avalanche deposit. This article argues that the rock-avalanche hypothesis best fits the geology. The transpressional model is problematic because the fault segment to which right-lateral displacement is purportedly transferred has been shown to have pure dip-slip displacement. The rock-avalanche model is based primarily on lithologic evidence. Throughout the hills are scattered outcrops displaying mosaic, jigsaw, and crackle breccia textures, all of which are characteristic of rock-avalanche deposits. Also, well-exposed roadcut outcrops display preserved source-rock bedding within the matrix-poor breccia framework. Though preserved, the bedding has been contorted and distorted by cataclastic flow of the breccia, another common characteristic of rock-avalanche deposits created during emplacement. The landslide is younger than 3 Ma, the age of inception of the Owens Valley graben, and older than 640 ± 50 ka, the age of a basalt flow that post-dates the landslide. An area in the Inyo Mountains southeast of the hills appears to be the most likely source. Interpretation of the Poverty Hills as a landslide mass suggests an alternative model for the Owens Valley fault-zone kinematics.

Key Words: Landslide • Rock Avalanche Transpression • Poverty Hills • Owens Valley • Owens Valley Fault







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Association of Engineering Geologists