Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; August 2006; v. 12; no. 3; p. 273-282; DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.12.3.273
© 2006 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCOY, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by LEAVITT, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates for Intact Coal Barriers Between Closed Underground Mines

KURT J. McCOY1, JOSEPH J. DONOVAN1 and BRUCE R. LEAVITT2

1 Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
2 Consulting Hydrogeologist, 2776 S-Bridge Rd., Washington, PA 15301

Unmined blocks of coal, called barriers, separate and restrict horizontal leakage between adjacent bituminous coal mines. Understanding the leakage rate across such barriers is important in planning mine closure and strongly affects recharge calculations for postmining flooding. This study presents upper-limit estimates for hydraulic conductivity (K) of intact barriers in two closed mines at moderate depth (75–300 m, or 250–980 ft) in the Pittsburgh coal basin. The estimates are based on pumping rates from these mines for the years ranging from 1992 to 2000. The two mines do not approach the outcrop and are sufficiently deep that vertical infiltration is thought to be negligible. Similarly, there are no saturated zones on the pumped mines' side of shared barriers with other mines, and therefore pumping is the only outflow. Virtually all of the pumping is attributed to leakage across or over the top of barriers shared with upgradient flooded mines. The length of shared barriers totals 24 km (15 mi) for the two mines, and the barriers range in thickness from 15 to 50 m (50–160 ft). K values calculated independently for each of the 9 years of the pumping record ranged from 0.037 m/d to 0.18 m/d (0.12 ft/d to 0.59 ft/d) using an isotropic model of barrier flow. Using an anisotropic model for differential K in the face cleat (Kf) and butt cleat (Kb) directions, results range from 0.074 to 0.34 m/d (0.24 to 1.1 ft/d) for Kf and from 0.022 to 0.099 m/d (0.072 to 0.32 ft/d) for Kb.

Key Words: Groundwater Hydrology • Hydraulic Conductivity • Mining Hydrogeology • Coal Mine Barriers







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists