Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
  Environmental and Engineering Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Environmental and Engineering Geoscience; February 2005; v. 11; no. 1; p. 5-15; DOI: 10.2113/11.1.5
© 2005 Association of Engineering Geologists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by COTTON, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Santiago Landslide and Associated Ridge-top Graben (Sackungen): Implications for Paleoseismic Landslide Studies

PHILIP L. JOHNSON1 and WILLIAM R. COTTON1

1 Cotton, Shires & Associates, 330 Village Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95030

Some recent paleoseismic studies have focused on dating ridge-top graben deposits to evaluate the timing of paleoseismic events. By contrast, our study of the Santiago landslide demonstrates that ridge-top grabens also can be associated with aseismic, deep-seated landsliding. The Santiago landslide in Anaheim Hills, California, failed during the winter of 1992–1993 in response to elevated groundwater conditions associated with intense rainfall. The head of the active landslide included a zone of extensional deformation along the bounding ridgeline. Interpretation of historical, aerial photographs indicates that the active landslide is a re-activated, ancient, deep-seated, translational landslide and an associated ridge-top graben. Large-diameter borings within the ridge-top graben encountered thick colluvium, steeply dipping colluvium-filled fractures, and shears with normal offsets. In contrast to the rupture surface within the central part of the landslide, the basal rupture surfaces in the graben area had significantly less gouge. We interpret this contrast in gouge development as an indication that the ridge-top graben developed later than the original landslide by upslope progression of the deformation. Our limit-equilibrium, slope-stability analyses indicate that either high groundwater or seismic ground motion could have previously activated the ancient landslide and ridge-top graben. Because colluvial deposits preserved within the ridge-top graben and produced by these two different types of triggering events could be misinterpreted as representing the late Quaternary paleoseismic record, these features are not useful for paleoseismic studies unless aseismic activation can be clearly precluded.

Key Words: Ridge-top Graben • Sackungen • Landslide • Paleoseismology • Rainfall






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Association of Engineering Geologists